The columns stay.
Six internal columns retain their source positions and profiles. The perimeter projections also remain. Rooms and furniture are placed around them.
The five original concepts, rebuilt as connected layouts on Jack’s 1,101 m² net whitebox plan. Room bands, public spaces and care routes adapt around the actual columns, escape core and retained service block.
The original sequence remains: window suites, a clinical corridor, adjoining support and experience rooms, then discovery and coffee. The longer escape core reshapes the upper route; the public gallery wraps around the retained service block.
The window corridor bends around the core, and the lower service block divides parts of the discovery floor.
Open this drawing Compare all five| Gallery | Public windowfront | Shared window club | Two destinations | Two patient houses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The emphasis | Preserves the Gallery’s room bands, public invitation and discreet route into care. | The view remains a public attraction while care has a defined room cluster. | Restores the original discovery walk and a distinct arrangement for private care. | Keeps the original two-wing structure and gives the busy corner a public use. | Restores the local lounge and preparation rooms that make the patient-house concept function. |
| Window frontage | Four window suites; lab on the left mall frontage | Public café, discovery and experiences | Two connected settings for shared window hospitality | West public café; east private suites | Two suite pairs and a smaller public window café |
| Patient suites | Four suites with ensuites | Four internal suites in two pairs | Four internal suites around a patient corridor | Two window suites and two internal suites | Two suites, a lounge and local preparation per house |
| Arrival | Separate public and patient arrivals proposed | One hosted arrival with a branch into care | Separate public and patient arrivals proposed | Two arrivals connected through a hosted hall | One hosted arrival with branches to the two houses |
| The trade-off | The window corridor bends around the core, and the lower service block divides parts of the discovery floor. | The lower suites have unequal proportions, and the core separates the window café from the eastern discovery room. | The escape core splits the club into two settings, and the retained service block makes the lower suite pair less regular. | The longer core makes the wing boundary less regular. One internal suite incorporates a column, and the hall bends around the service block. | House A’s preparation room is shaped by the escape approach. The café is smaller, and public salon access shifts onto the shared spine. |
All five share the perimeter and fixed elements traced from Jack’s whitebox drawing, dated 23 September 2026. The source states 1,173 m² total, 72 m² deducted and 1,101 m² net. Proposed room partitions, entrances and connections through the existing internal façade require measured design and engineering review. The drawings are concept studies.
Every option starts with the same traced base. The fit-out changes; the structural constraints do not.
Six internal columns retain their source positions and profiles. The perimeter projections also remain. Rooms and furniture are placed around them.
The longer core and its side-door approaches stay clear. The care route passes below it; no through route is assumed behind its rounded end.
The existing internal façade is shown as a dashed coordination line. These concepts require openings and local removal to join the combined spaces, subject to the engineering study called for on Jack’s drawing.
Four suites and their ensuites remain in each option, alongside the lab, three assessment rooms, HBOT, salons and support. Equipment fit, measured circulation widths, entrances and the fire strategy still need the appointed design team.
Explore four interior directions for the same clinic brief.